论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Kimura T, Matsumoto C, Nomoto H
Received 15 October 2018
Accepted for publication 24 January 2019
Published 14 March 2019 Volume 2019:13 Pages 501—513
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S190995
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser
Purpose: The head-mounted automated perimeter imo® is a new portable perimeter that does not
require a dark room and can be used to examine patients in any setting. In this
study, imo 24plus (1-2) AIZE examinations were compared with previous Humphrey
Field Analyzer (HFA) 30-2 (SITA standard) examinations within the same patient.
Patients and methods: imo examinations (either head-mounted [i-H] or fixed [i-F] type)
were performed in patients with glaucoma or suspected glaucoma who had already
experienced HFA five or more times. Measurement time and correlations of mean
deviation (MD) and visual field index (VFI) values were compared between groups
for HFA, i-H, i-F, and imo total (i-T). Fixation loss (FL), false-positive
(FP), and false-negative (FN) detection rates were compared. The percentage of
binocular random single-eye tests under possible non-occlusion conditions using
imo was determined. Mann–Whitney U test was performed, and Spearman’s rank-order
correlation coefficient was calculated.
Results: The
inclusion period was July to December 2016. Among 273 subjects (543 eyes), 147
(292 eyes) were tested with i-H type and 126 (251 eyes) with i-F type. Mean MD
values for HFA and i-T were −6.1±7.8 and −6.2±7.1 dB, respectively. Mean
measurement times for HFA, i-H, i-F, and i-T were 15.23±2.07, 10.47±2.11, 11.04±2.31,
and 10.54±2.19 minutes, respectively (P <0.01 for HFA vs i-H/i-F). Total mean measurement
time was shorter by 30.8% for i-T vs HFA. Correlation coefficients of MD and
VFI were R 2>0.81 for HFA vs i-H and i-F.. FP and FN
detection rates were significantly higher with i-T than HFA; there was no
significant difference in FL. Binocular random single-eye tests were possible
in 85% of cases.
Conclusion: imo
reduced measurement time by 30.8%. imo VFI and MD values were highly correlated
with HFA. As i-F and i-H types produced similar results, imo can be used in
accordance with the patient’s situation.
Keywords: visual
field, glaucoma, automatic perimetry, mean deviation, visual field index,
reliability index
摘要视频链接:Imo 24plus AIZE