论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Tranberg M, Bech BH, Blaakær J, Jensen JS, Svanholm H, Andersen B
Received 7 February 2018
Accepted for publication 15 June 2018
Published 23 August 2018 Volume 2018:10 Pages 1027—1036
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S164826
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak
Peer reviewer comments 6
Editor who approved publication: Professor Vera Ehrenstein
Background: Participation in cervical cancer screening varies by socioeconomic
status. The aims were to assess if offering human papilloma virus (HPV)
self-sampling kits has an effect on screening participation among various
socioeconomic groups and to determine if two invitation strategies for offering
self-sampling influence the participation rate equally.
Methods: The study was based on registry data that were
applied to data from a randomized controlled trial (n=9,791) measuring how
offering HPV self-sampling affected screening participation. The women received
either 1) a self-sampling kit mailed directly to their homes (directly mailed
group); 2) an invitation to order the kit (opt-in group); or 3) a standard
second reminder to attend regular cytology screening (control group). The
participation data were linked to registries containing socioeconomic
information.
Results: Women in the directly mailed group participated
significantly more than women in the control group, regardless of their
socioeconomic status, but the largest effects were observed in Western
immigrants (participation difference [PD]=18.1%, 95% CI=10.2%–26.0%) and social
welfare recipients (PD=15.2%, 95% CI=9.7%–20.6%). Compared with the
control group, opt-in self-sampling only had an insignificant effect on
participation among women who were immigrants, retired, or less educated.
Western immigrants had a significantly higher increase in participation than
native Danish women when kits were mailed directly compared with the opt-in
strategy (PD=18.1%, 95% CI=10.2%–26.2% and PD=5.5%,
95% CI=2.9%–8.1%, respectively, P =0.01).
Conclusion: All socioeconomic groups benefited from the
directly mailed strategy in terms of higher screening participation, but
Western immigrants and lower socioeconomic groups seemed to benefit the most.
Immigrants and some lower socioeconomic groups only had insignificant benefits
of opt-in self-sampling. The directly mailed strategy might be preferable to opt-in
self-sampling because it ensures that ethnic minority groups obtain benefits of
introducing HPV self-sampling in an organized cervical cancer screening
program.
Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials NCT02680262.
Registered February 10, 2016.
Keywords: self-sampling,
human papillomavirus testing, cervical cancer screening, screening
participation, socioeconomic status, social class, mass screening