论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Wenke R, Weir KA, Noble C, Mahoney J, Mickan S
Received 14 November 2017
Accepted for publication 9 February 2018
Published 21 June 2018 Volume 2018:11 Pages 269—277
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S157034
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser
Purpose: The current project evaluated the impact of a short-term,
supported funding initiative that allowed staff from allied health (AH)
professions to undertake research activity within rostered employment time.
Specifically, the project will report on outcomes pertaining to individual
research capacity, research output, and overall satisfaction with the
initiative.
Participants and methods: Sixteen AH clinicians (n=16) from six AH
professions participated in the evaluation of the initiative, with data being
collected within a service improvement framework. Clinicians received up to 4
weeks of protected time relieved from their clinical duties to undertake
research activities, including writing for publication, undertaking a
systematic review, data analysis, and preparation of ethics applications. An AH
Research Fellow provided additional support and mentorship, including the
development of an implementation plan. Evaluation included pre–post measures of
individual research capacity using a 15-item self-report Research Capacity and
Culture (RCC) survey, a post-implementation satisfaction survey, and monitoring
of research output achieved.
Results: Statistically significant improvements (p <0.05) were found on 14 out of
15 items on the RCC tool, with meaningful improvements in securing funding,
analyzing qualitative data, writing for publication, literature searching
skills, and providing advice to less experienced researchers. Overall
satisfaction with the initiative was high, with positive comments from AH
professionals (AHPs) regarding the initiative. Research output arising from the
initiative included eleven manuscripts being submitted, with six currently in
publication and others under review.
Conclusion: The preliminary findings support the feasibility
of implementing a local, clinical funding model to promote individual research
capacity and research output for AHPs. The short-term funding should be
supported by local mentorship and guidance. Local barriers and suggestions to
optimize implementation, including integrating within existing research
infrastructure and using flexible “backfill” options, will also be described.
Keywords: research
capacity building, allied health, research engagement, funding
摘要视频链接:Supported funding for allied
health research