论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Rezaei NM, Hasegawa M, Ishijima M, Nakhaei K, Okubo T, Taniyama T, Ghassemi A, Tahsili T, Park W, Hirota M, Ogawa T
Received 15 December 2017
Accepted for publication 28 March 2018
Published 8 June 2018 Volume 2018:13 Pages 3381—3395
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S159955
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Farooq Shiekh
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Thomas J Webster
Purpose: Zirconia is a potential alternative to titanium for dental and
orthopedic implants. Here we report the biological and bone integration
capabilities of a new zirconia surface with distinct morphology at the meso-,
micro-, and nano-scales.
Methods: Machine-smooth and roughened zirconia disks were
prepared from yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP), with
rough zirconia created by solid-state laser sculpting. Morphology of the
surfaces was analyzed by three-dimensional imaging and profiling. Rat
femur-derived bone marrow cells were cultured on zirconia disks. Zirconia
implants were placed in rat femurs and the strength of osseointegration was
evaluated by biomechanical push-in test.
Results: The rough zirconia surface was characterized by
meso-scale (50 µm wide, 6–8 µm deep) grooves, micro-scale (1–10 µm wide, 0.1–3
µm deep) valleys, and nano-scale (10–400 nm wide, 10–300 nm high) nodules,
whereas the machined surface was flat and uniform. The average roughness (Ra)
of rough zirconia was five times greater than that of machined zirconia. The
expression of bone-related genes such as collagen I, osteopontin, osteocalcin,
and BMP-2 was 7–25 times upregulated in osteoblasts on rough zirconia at the
early stage of culture. The number of attached cells and rate of proliferation
were similar between machined and rough zirconia. The strength of
osseointegration for rough zirconia was twice that of machined zirconia at
weeks two and four of healing, with evidence of mineralized tissue persisting
around rough zirconia implants as visualized by electron microscopy and
elemental analysis.
Conclusion: This unique meso-/micro-/nano-scale rough
zirconia showed a remarkable increase in osseointegration compared to
machine-smooth zirconia associated with accelerated differentiation of
osteoblasts. Cell attachment and proliferation were not compromised on rough
zirconia unlike on rough titanium. This is the first report introducing a rough
zirconia surface with distinct hierarchical morphology and providing an effective
strategy to improve and develop zirconia implants.
Keywords: bone–implant
integration, Y-TZP, hierarchical morphology, multi-scale rough, dental and
orthopedic implant
摘要视频链接:Meso-, micro-, and nano-scale
rough Zr