论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Burns LR, Housman MG, Booth RE, Koenig AM
Received 14 September 2017
Accepted for publication 16 November 2017
Published 11 January 2018 Volume 2018:11 Pages 39—49
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S151647
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser
Background: The USA devotes roughly $200 billion (6%) of annual national
health expenditures to medical devices. A substantial proportion of this
spending occurs during orthopedic (eg, hip and knee) arthroplasties – two
high-volume hospital procedures. The implants used in these procedures are
commonly known as physician preference items (PPIs), reflecting the physician’s
choice of implant and vendor used. The foundations for this preference are not
entirely clear. This study examines what implant and vendor characteristics, as
evaluated by orthopedic surgeons, are associated with their preference. It also
examines other factors (eg, financial relationships and vendor tenure) that may
contribute to implant preference.
Methods: We surveyed all practicing orthopedic surgeons
performing 12 or more implant procedures annually in the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania. The survey identified each surgeon’s preferred hip/knee vendor as
well as the factors that surgeons state they use in selecting that primary
vendor. We compared the surgeons’ evaluation of multiple characteristics of
implants and vendors using analysis of variance techniques, controlling for
surgeon characteristics, hospital characteristics, and surgeon–vendor ties that
might influence these evaluations.
Results: Physician’s preference is heavily influenced by
technology/implant factors and sales/service factors. Other considerations such
as vendor reputation, financial relationships with the vendor, and implant cost
seem less important. These findings hold regardless of implant type (hip vs
knee) and specific vendor.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that there is a great deal
of consistency in the factors that surgeons state they use to evaluate PPIs
such as hip and knee implants. The findings offer an empirically derived
definition of PPIs that is consistent with the product and nonproduct
strategies pursued by medical device companies. PPIs are products that surgeons
rate favorably on the twin dimensions of technology and sales/service.
Keywords: physician’s
preference, surgeons, orthopedics, hip implants, PPIs
摘要视频链接:Physician preference items