论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Wang K, Zeng G, Li R, Luo Y, Wang M, Hu Y, Xu W, Zhou L, Chen R, Chen X
Received 20 April 2017
Accepted for publication 1 August 2017
Published 6 September 2017 Volume 2017:12 Pages 2655—2668
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S140093
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Charles Downs
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Richard Russell
Background: Cycle ergometer training (CET) has been shown to improve exercise
performance of the quadriceps muscles in patients with COPD, and inspiratory
muscle training (IMT) may improve the pressure-generating capacity of the
inspiratory muscles. However, the effects of combined CET and IMT remain
unclear and there is a lack of comprehensive assessment.
Materials and methods: Eighty-one patients with COPD were randomly
allocated to three groups: 28 received 8 weeks of CET + IMT (combined training
group), 27 received 8 weeks of CET alone (CET group), and 26 only received 8
weeks of free walking (control group). Comprehensive assessment including
respiratory muscle strength, exercise capacity, pulmonary function, dyspnea,
quality of life, emotional status, nutritional status, and body mass index,
airflow obstruction, and exercise capacity index were measured before and after
the pulmonary rehabilitation program.
Results: Respiratory muscle strength, exercise
capacity, inspiratory capacity, dyspnea, quality of life, depression and
anxiety, and nutritional status were all improved in the combined training and
CET groups when compared with that in the control group (P <0.05) after pulmonary
rehabilitation program. Inspiratory muscle strength increased
significantly in the combined training group when compared with that in the CET
group (ΔPImax [maximal inspiratory pressure] 5.20±0.89 cmH2O vs 1.32±0.91 cmH2O; P <0.05). However, there were no
significant differences in the other indices between the two groups (P >0.05). Patients with weakened
respiratory muscles in the combined training group derived no greater benefit
than those without respiratory muscle weakness (P >0.05).
There were no significant differences in these indices between the patients
with malnutrition and normal nutrition after pulmonary rehabilitation program (P >0.05).
Conclusion: Combined training is more effective than CET
alone for increasing inspiratory muscle strength. IMT may not be useful when
combined with CET in patients with weakened inspiratory muscles. Nutritional
status had slight impact on the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation. A
comprehensive assessment approach can be more objective to evaluate the effects
of combined CET and IMT.
Keywords: chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary rehabilitation, cycle ergometer,
inspiratory muscle training, comprehensive assessment, exercise performance
摘要视频链接:CET + IMT – modest benefit
compared with CET alone