论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Ahn JS, Lin J, Ogawa S, Yuan C, O'Brien T, Le BHC, Bothwell AM, Moon H, Hadjiat Y, Ganapathi A
Received 24 April 2017
Accepted for publication 19 May 2017
Published 18 August 2017 Volume 2017:10 Pages 1963—1972
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S140320
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Minal Joshi
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr E. Alfonso Romero-Sandoval
Abstract: Treatment of cancer pain is generally based on the three-step World
Health Organization (WHO) pain relief ladder, which utilizes a sequential
approach with drugs of increasing potency. Goals of pain management include
optimization of analgesia, optimization of activities of daily living,
minimization of adverse effects, and avoidance of aberrant drug taking. In
addition, it is recommended that analgesic regimens are individualized and
simplified to help ensure patient compliance and should provide the least
invasive, easiest, and safest route of opioid administration to ensure adequate
analgesia. Buprenorphine and fentanyl are two opioids available for the relief
of moderate-to-severe cancer pain. Available clinical data regarding the
transdermal (TD) formulations of these opioids and the extent to which they
fulfill the recommendations mentioned earlier are systematically reviewed, with
the aim of providing additional information for oncologists and pain
specialists regarding their comparative use. Due to lack of studies directly
comparing TD buprenorphine with TD fentanyl, data comparing these with other
step-3 opioids are also evaluated in a network fashion.
Keywords: analgesia,
cancer pain management, chronic pain/drug therapy, drug evaluation, pain management,
patch analgesics
摘要视频链接:Transdermal buprenorphine and
fentanyl patches in cancer pain