论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Suravajhala P, Benso A
Received 30 September 2016
Accepted for publication 29 December 2016
Published 12 June 2017 Volume 2017:10 Pages 57—64
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/AABC.S123604
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Juan Fernandez-Recio
Abstract: Next-generation sequencing technology has provided resources to easily
explore and identify candidate single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and
variants. However, there remains a challenge in identifying and inferring the
causal SNPs from sequence data. A problem with different methods that predict
the effect of mutations is that they produce false positives. In this
hypothesis, we provide an overview of methods known for identifying causal
variants and discuss the challenges, fallacies, and prospects in discerning
candidate SNPs. We then propose a three-point classification strategy, which
could be an additional annotation method in identifying causalities.
Keywords: clinical mastitis, single-nucleotide
polymorphisms, variants, associations, diseases, linkage disequilibrium, GWAS
摘要视频链接:Prioritizing SNPs and
variants