论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors McCafferty S, Lim G, Duncan W, Enikov ET, Schwiegerling J, Levine J, Kew C
Received 21 February 2017
Accepted for publication 16 March 2017
Published 3 May 2017 Volume 2017:11 Pages 835—840
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S135272
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Amy Norman
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser
Purpose: Clinically evaluate a modified applanating surface Goldmann tonometer
prism designed to substantially negate errors due to patient variability in
biomechanics.
Methods: A modified Goldmann prism with a correcting
applanation tonometry surface (CATS) was mathematically optimized to minimize
the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement error due to patient variability in
corneal thickness, stiffness, curvature, and tear film adhesion force. A
comparative clinical study of 109 eyes measured IOP with CATS and Goldmann
prisms. The IOP measurement differences between the CATS and Goldmann prisms
were correlated to corneal thickness, hysteresis, and curvature.
Results: The CATS tonometer prism in correcting for Goldmann
central corneal thickness (CCT) error demonstrated a reduction to <±2 mmHg
in 97% of a standard CCT population. This compares to only 54% with CCT error
<±2 mmHg using the Goldmann prism. Equal reductions of ~50% in errors due to
corneal rigidity and curvature were also demonstrated.
Conclusion: The results validate the CATS prism’s improved
accuracy and expected reduced sensitivity to Goldmann errors without IOP bias
as predicted by mathematical modeling. The CATS replacement for the Goldmann
prism does not change Goldmann measurement technique or interpretation.
Keywords: glaucoma, tonometry, Goldmann, IOP,
intraocular pressure, appalnation tonometer, corneal biomechanics, CATS
tonometer, CCT, central corneal thickness, tonometer error
摘要视频链接:Goldmann
tonometer error correcting prism