论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Interrigi MC, Trovato FM, Catalano D, Trovato GM
Received 5 November 2016
Accepted for publication 8 January 2017
Published 9 February 2017 Volume 2017:13 Pages 151—160
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S126770
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Lucy Goodman
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Garry Walsh
Purpose: Thoracic
ultrasound (TUS) has been proposed as an easy-option replacement for chest
X-ray (CXR) in emergency diagnosis of pneumonia, pleural effusion, and
pneumothorax. We investigated CXR unforeseen diagnosis, subsequently
investigated by TUS, considering its usefulness in clinical risk assessment and
management and also assessing the sustainability of telementoring.
Patients and methods: This observational report includes a period of 6
months with proactive concurrent adjunctive TUS diagnosis telementoring, which was
done using freely available smartphone applications for transfer of images and
movies.
Results: Three hundred and seventy emergency TUS scans
(excluding trauma patients) were performed and telementored. In 310 cases, no
significant chest pathology was detected either by CXR, TUS, or the subsequent
work-up; in 24 patients, there was full concordance between TUS and CXR (ten
isolated pleural effusion; eleven pleural effusion with lung consolidations;
and three lung consolidation without pleural effusion); in ten patients with
lung consolidations, abnormalities identified by CXR were not detected by TUS.
In 26 patients, only TUS diagnosis criteria of disease were present: in 19
patients, CXR was not diagnostic, ie, substantially negative, but TUS detected
these conditions correctly, and these were later confirmed by computed
tomography (CT). In seven patients, even if chest disease was identified by
CXR, such diagnoses were significantly modified by ultrasound, and CT confirmed
that TUS was more appropriate. The overall respective individual performances
of CXR and TUS for the diagnosis of a pleural–pulmonary disease in emergency
are good, with accuracy >95%.
Conclusion: About 20% of pneumonia cases were
detectable only by CXR and 20% only by TUS and not by CXR; ie, about 40% of
patients may have been misdiagnosed if, by chance, only one of the two tools
had been used. The concurrent use of TUS and CXR increases the overall
sensitivity and specificity. The contribution of expert telementoring and final
reappraisal is a valuable and sustainable element for emergency physicians’
training and performance, contributing reasonably to mitigation of clinical
risks.
Keywords: echography,
pneumonia, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, diagnostic performance
摘要视频链接:Clinical risk and thoracic ultrasound