论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
A Pilot Study of Modified Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercises (Mini-CEX) in Rotation Students in the Department of Endocrinology
Authors He Y, Wen S , Zhou M, Li X, Gong M, Zhou L
Received 25 April 2022
Accepted for publication 5 July 2022
Published 9 July 2022 Volume 2022:15 Pages 2031—2038
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S372253
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Juei-Tang Cheng
Background: The mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) is an excellent tool for assessing the clinical abilities of medical students in intense clinical practice. In this study, the Mini-CEX was adapted to professional questionnaires for Diabetes Mellitus (DM), and examined in medical students completing their clerkship rotation in the department of endocrinology.
Methods: From January 2021 to January 2022, all rotating medical students at Shanghai Pudong Hospital completed two mini-CEX exams before and following their rotation under the supervision and guidance of six tutors. The mini-CEX form was modified in this study primarily for inpatient management based on our clinical experience and updated DM guidelines of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), and the Chinese Diabetes Society (CDS). Each component of the mini-CEX assessment, including medical interviews, physical examination, clinical judgment, clinical management, and overall clinical competence was evaluated using a nine-item questionnaire.
Results: Our findings revealed that the second-round performance on the assessments significantly improved, as indicated by higher scores on each component. The Pearson association analysis revealed that the feedback time of the first examination was markedly associated with improved overall scores (r= 0.391, p< 0.001). However, no correlations were discovered between patient age, gender, disease severity disparity, or the interval between examinations (p> 0.05). Additional regression analysis revealed that the feedback time during the initial examination was the most significant contributor to the increased overall scores (β=0.391, p< 0.001).
Conclusion: This newly designed mini-CEX form based on current ADA and EASD guidelines may assist trainees in more effectively diagnosing and managing DM in inpatients, particularly those with macrovascular, microvascular, or peripheral nerve neuropathy. This study aims to assess the efficacy of administering a modified mini-CEX form to rotating trainees participating in an endocrine clerkship.
Keywords: mini-clinical evaluation exercise, diabetes, medical student, feedback time