论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Shahin I, Bonnin CDM, Saleh E, Helmy K, Youssef UM, Vieta E
Received 26 April 2020
Accepted for publication 2 September 2020
Published 28 September 2020 Volume 2020:16 Pages 2209—2219
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S259996
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Roger Pinder
Background: The DSM5-defined mixed features in
depression do not include psychomotor agitation, irritability or
distractibility because they are considered overlapping symptoms. A growing
number of modern psychiatrists have expressed dissatisfaction with this and
proposed alternative sets of mixed symptoms that are much more common and
clinically relevant. Among such alternative criteria were those proposed by
Koukopoulos. He utilized the research diagnostic criteria of agitated
depression (RDC-A) as a mixed depression subtype, and validated another form of
mixed depression, the Koukopoulos criteria for mixed depression (K-DMX).
Purpose: This
study provides psychometric validation for the first self-rated scale designed
to measure the most common mixed symptoms in depression as proposed by
Koukopoulos.
Patients and Methods: We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional study of 170 patients
with unipolar depression. They completed the Shahin Mixed Depression Scale
(SMDS) and underwent expert interviews as a gold standard reference. SMDS’
psychometric properties were assessed, including Cronbach’s alpha, factor
analysis, sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and accuracy.
Results: We
found significant association and agreement between mixity according to SMDS
and the gold standard (K-DMX and RDC-A according to expert interview) with good
internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha=0.87), high sensitivity (=91.4%),
specificity (=98.0%), positive predictive value (=96.9%), negative predictive
value (= 94.2%) and accuracy (=95.2%). Factor analysis identified one factor
for psychomotor agitation and another for mixity without psychomotor agitation.
Conclusion: SMDS
was a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the frequently encountered
and clinically relevant mixed features in depression.
Keywords: mixed
depression, mixed depression scale, major depressive disorder, psychomotor
agitation, agitated depression, unipolar depression