论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Liu Z, Wu L, Cao J, Yang Z, Zhou C, Cao L, Wu H, Shen H, Jin M, Zhang Y, Mao X, Xiang J, Ma K, Li B, Zhang T, Hu Y
Received 7 May 2018
Accepted for publication 7 August 2018
Published 23 October 2018 Volume 2018:11 Pages 7323—7331
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S173391
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Andrew Yee
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Tohru Yamada
Purpose: ERBB2 exon 20 insertions
(20ins) have been identified as oncogenic drivers in lung cancers. Lung cancer
patients with 20ins benefit from afatinib. However, response heterogeneity was
observed in patients harboring different 20ins subtypes. In this study, we
interrogated clinical characteristics in ERBB2 -mutated
Chinese lung cancer and investigated the clinical outcomes of specific ERBB2 20ins in response to
afatinib.
Experimental design: In this study, we retrospectively collected
genomic profiling data of 7,520 lung cancer patients sequenced using
next-generation sequencing in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement
Amendments-certified laboratory. We analyzed the clinical and molecular
features of patients harboring ERBB2 20ins
and evaluated clinical outcomes of 19 patients with clinical records after
afatinib treatment.
Results: ERBB2 20ins
were identified in 2.27% (171/7,520) of this lung cancer cohort. It occurred
with a high proportion in females with adenocarcinoma histology. ERBB2 20ins was mutually
exclusive with other well-established lung cancer oncogenic driver mutations.
The most frequently appearing subtype was Y772_A775dup (69.6%) and several
novel insertion subtypes were also identified. The correlations of specific
20ins subtypes and survival were investigated. The presence of a glycine at
position 778 in ERBB2 was
suggested to be a common feature of drug sensitivity mutations. Patients
harboring G778_P780dup (G778) subtype achieved longer median progression-free
survival and median overall survival than other 20ins (non-G778) subtypes
(median progression-free survival, 10 vs 3.3 months, P =0.32; median overall survival,
19.7 vs 7 months, P =0.16). Moreover,
we presented the first clinical case of a lung squamous cell carcinoma patient
harboring ERBB2 20ins who achieved
partial response to afatinib.
Conclusion: This study interrogated the characteristics
of ERBB2 20ins in a large cohort
from single ethnicity and demonstrated the response heterogeneity to afatinib
among different ERBB2 20ins
subtypes. Further studies in a larger cohort are needed to investigate the
underlying molecular mechanisms and clinical response of different ERBB2 20ins subtypes.
Keywords: ERBB2 , lung cancer, afatinib,
survival, heterogeneity