Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the value of shear wave elastography (SWE) for characterization of breast masses in a Chinese population.
Patients and methods: Two thousand two hundred seventy-three women consented to be prospectively enrolled for the characterization of breast masses with ultrasound and SWE. Breast masses were known from symptoms, palpability, and/or previous imaging screening with mammography and/or ultrasound. Correlation of SWE qualitative and quantitative features with malignancy risk and impact on diagnostic performance of combining SWE features were assessed, and the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) scoring was calculated using histopathology as reference.
Results: Data of 2,262 masses (median size: 13 mm; range: 1.3–50) from 2,262 patients (median age: 43 years; range: 18–91) were investigated, of which 752 (33.3%) were malignant. Sensitivity and specificity of BI-RADS diagnosis were 97.5% (733/752) and 54.8% (827/1,510), respectively. By logistic regression, the combination of maximum elasticity (E _max) measurements with BI-RADS assessments increased the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve from 0.908 (95% CI: 0.896–0.920) to 0.954 (95% CI: 0.944–0.962). Using E _max of 30 kPa or lower to selectively downgrade BI-RADS 4a masses to follow-up, and E _max of 160 kPa or higher to selectively upgrade BI-RADS 3 lesions to biopsy, specificity significantly increased from 54.8% (827/1,510) to 66.1% (998/1,510) (P <0.001) while sensitivity decreased nonsignificantly from 97.5% (733/752) to 96.9% (729/752) (P =0.2891). Positive predictive value for biopsy recommendation increased from 51.7% (733/1,417) to 58.7% (729/1,241) (P <0.001).
Conclusion: Adding SWE maximum stiffness to BI-RADS 3 and BI-RADS 4a breast masses in a Chinese population increased significantly the specificity of breast ultrasonography, without significant change in sensitivity.
Keywords: breast cancer, shear wave elastography, ultrasound, multicentre