已发表论文

来那度胺治疗急性髓性白血病的疗效和安全性: 系统综述和荟萃分析

 

Authors Xie CH, Wei M, Yang FY, Wu FZ, Chen L, Wang JK, Liu Q, Huang JX

Received 19 March 2018

Accepted for publication 5 July 2018

Published 18 September 2018 Volume 2018:10 Pages 3637—3648

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S168610

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak

Peer reviewer comments 4

Editor who approved publication: Professor Nakshatri

Background: Lenalidomide is effective for the treatment of low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with deletion 5q abnormalities. However, whether lenalidomide leads to a significant improvement in treatment response and overall survival (OS) in cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains controversial. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in the treatment of AML.
Methods: Clinical studies were identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Efficacy outcomes included overall response rate (ORR), complete remission (CR), and OS. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence of grade 3 and 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs).
Results: Eleven studies were included in our meta-analysis; collectively these studies featured 407 AML patients. Pooled estimates for overall ORR and CR were 31% (95% CI: 26%–36%) and 21% (95% CI: 16%–27%), respectively. Thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, and infection were the most common grade 3 and 4 AEs.
Conclusion: Lenalidomide may have some clinical activity in AML, but the population that would benefit from lenalidomide and incorporating lenalidomide into combination drug strategies need to be better defined.
Keywords: azacitidine, cytarabine, immunomodulatory agent, cytogenetic risk




Figure 1 Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses...