9 7 4 8 9
论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
- 3.3 Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)
- 3.4 Clin Epidemiol
- 2.5 Cancer Manag Res
- 2.9 Infect Drug Resist
- 3.5 Clin Interv Aging
- 4.7 Drug Des Dev Ther
- 2.7 Int J Chronic Obstr
- 6.6 Int J Nanomed
- 2.5 Int J Women's Health
- 2.5 Neuropsych Dis Treat
- 2.7 OncoTargets Ther
- 2.0 Patient Prefer Adher
- 2.3 Ther Clin Risk Manag
- 2.5 J Pain Res
- 2.8 Diabet Metab Synd Ob
- 2.8 Psychol Res Behav Ma
- 3.0 Nat Sci Sleep
- 1.8 Pharmgenomics Pers Med
- 2.7 Risk Manag Healthc Policy
- 4.2 J Inflamm Res
- 2.1 Int J Gen Med
- 4.2 J Hepatocell Carcinoma
- 3.7 J Asthma Allergy
- 1.9 Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol
- 2.7 J Multidiscip Healthc
已发表论文
腹腔镜手术、开放式根治性子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结切除术在早期宫颈癌治疗中的比较：一项回顾性研究
Authors Guo J, Yang L, Cai J, Xu L, Min J, Shen Y, Xiong Z, Dong W, Bunyamanop V, Wang Z
Received 4 November 2017
Accepted for publication 18 March 2018
Published 18 September 2018 Volume 2018:11 Pages 5903—5908
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S156064
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Jianmin Xu
Objective: To compare
clinical outcomes in laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy with pelvic
lymphadenectomy (LRH) in early cervical cancer without the selection bias.
Methods: One special retrospective study was conducted with more than 400 patients involved in laparoscopic procedure.
Results: Our results suggest that estimated blood loss and transfusion requirements were significantly lower in the LRH group. Postoperative hospital stay was also significantly shorter in the LRH group. Significant difference was found in the number of pelvic lymph nodes retrieved between the LRH and open radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (ORH) groups. There were no differences in operating time, perioperative complications, progression-free survival, and overall survival between the LRH and ORH groups.
Conclusion: LRH can be considered a safe and effective alternative to conventional open surgery (ORH) for early-stage cervical cancer.
Keywords: early cervical cancer, clinical outcomes, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, retrospective study
Methods: One special retrospective study was conducted with more than 400 patients involved in laparoscopic procedure.
Results: Our results suggest that estimated blood loss and transfusion requirements were significantly lower in the LRH group. Postoperative hospital stay was also significantly shorter in the LRH group. Significant difference was found in the number of pelvic lymph nodes retrieved between the LRH and open radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (ORH) groups. There were no differences in operating time, perioperative complications, progression-free survival, and overall survival between the LRH and ORH groups.
Conclusion: LRH can be considered a safe and effective alternative to conventional open surgery (ORH) for early-stage cervical cancer.
Keywords: early cervical cancer, clinical outcomes, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, retrospective study
