论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Que Y, Liang Y, Zhao JJ, Ding Y, Peng RQ, Guan YX, Zhang X
Received 3 February 2018
Accepted for publication 4 April 2018
Published 19 July 2018 Volume 2018:10 Pages 2141—2150
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S164535
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Cristina Weinberg
Peer reviewer comments 4
Editor who approved publication: Dr Antonella D'Anneo
Objective: Research efforts have investigated therapies targeting tyrosine
kinase signaling pathways. We performed a pooled analysis to determine the
frequency of severe adverse effects in patients with soft tissue sarcoma
treated with pazopanib, sorafenib and sunitinib.
Materials and
methods: We performed a comprehensive search
of PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid, the Cochrane Library and Embase databases from
the drugs’ inception to May 2017 to identify clinical trials. All-grade and
severe adverse events (AEs; grade≥3) were analyzed.
Results: A total of 10 trials published between 2009 and 2016, including
843 patients, were eligible for analysis. We included 424 patients (three
studies) who received pazopanib 800 mg daily, 353 patients (five studies)
who received sorafenib 400 mg twice daily and 66 patients (two studies)
who received sunitinib 37.5 mg daily. The incidence of AEs is different
among the three VEGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Pazopanib showed
higher incidence of all-grade nausea, diarrhea and hypertension compared with
sorafenib and sunitinib. However, patients in the sorafenib group experienced a
significantly higher frequency of all-grade rash (26.1%), hand–foot syndrome
(33.4%) and mucositis (38.5%). The difference was highly significant for
sorafenib vs. pazopanib in the incidence of all-grade rash (odds ratio [OR]
1.649, 95% CI 1.086–2.505, P =0.023),
hand–foot syndrome (OR 3.096, 95% CI 1.271–7.544, P =0.009) and mucositis (OR 4.562,
95% CI 2.132–9.609, P <0.001).
Moreover, the frequency of grade ≥3 mucositis was significantly higher in the
sunitinib group compared with the pazopanib or sorafenib group (7.6% vs. 1.3%,
OR 6.448, 95% CI 1.499–27.731, P =0.013).
Conclusion: Statistically significant differences in certain common adverse
effects, such as all-grade and severe AEs, were detected among pazopanib,
sorafenib and sunitinib in the current study. Early and prompt management is
critically needed to avoid unnecessary dose reductions and treatment-related
discontinuations.
Keywords: pazopanib, sorafenib, sunitinib, soft tissue sarcoma