已发表论文

458 例卵巢肿瘤患者血清中四种肿瘤标志物检测结果分析(四种肿瘤标志物联合检测在卵巢癌诊断中的价值)

 

Authors Chen F, Shen J, Wang J, Cai P, Huang Y

Received 31 October 2017

Accepted for publication 27 February 2018

Published 22 May 2018 Volume 2018:10 Pages 1313—1318

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S155693

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Amy Norman

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Leylah Drusbosky

目的:探讨人附睾分泌蛋白 4HE4)、糖类抗原 125CA125)、糖类抗原 19-9CA19-9)、癌胚抗原(CEA)及其联合检测在卵巢肿瘤患者诊断中的应用价值。
方法:选取健康女性 386 例纳入对照组,选取妇科良性卵巢肿瘤患者 262 例纳入良性组,选取确诊为恶性卵巢肿瘤的 196 例患者纳入恶性肿瘤组。采用电化学发光免疫法测定各组血清中 HE4CA125CA19-9  及 CEA  的表达水平。
结果:表明良性和恶性肿瘤组患者血清  HE4CA125CA19-9  及  CEA  表达水均明显高于对照组(<0.01),恶性组 种标志物表达水平明显高于良性组(<0.01)。HE4 对卵巢癌的特异性高(98.6%)。单一指标分析时,HE4 CA125CA19-9 和 CEA 的敏感度分别为 63.78%62.75%35.71% 和 38.78%。联合两种或两种以上标志物进行分析时,诊断的敏感度提高而特异性降低。 HE4 与 CA125 组合效能最高,其敏感度、特异性依次是 70.10%69.08%。而联合 HE4 与 CA125 并使用卵巢恶性肿瘤风险模型(ROMA),为诊断筛查卵巢恶性肿瘤提供了有效的手段。三种甚至四种标志物进行分析时,敏感度提高到 88.52%,与 HE4 和  CA125 组合相比,无显著差异(>0.05)。
结论:与 HE4 和  CA125 两种指标联合检测相比,三种或四种标志物联合检测未能明显提高诊断效能。
Keywords: human epididymis protein 4, carbohydrate antigen 125, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen, pelvic tumor




Figure 1 The detection of the ROC curve of ovarian cancer by four tumor markers.