论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Birbara C, Dabezies JR EJ, Burr AM, Fountaine RJ, Smith MD, Brown MT, West CR, Arends RH, Verburg KM
Received 19 April 2017
Accepted for publication 14 September 2017
Published 8 January 2018 Volume 2018:11 Pages 151—164
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S135257
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Katherine Hanlon
Background/objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and
efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) tanezumab administration in
osteoarthritis (OA) patients.
Materials and
methods: Study 1027 (NCT01089725), a
placebo-controlled trial, evaluated the efficacy of SC tanezumab (ie, 2.5, 5,
and 10 mg) and the therapeutic equivalence of 10 mg tanezumab given
subcutaneously versus intravenously every 8 weeks in the symptomatic treatment
of OA. Coprimary endpoints were: change from baseline in Western Ontario and
McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) Pain and Physical Function
indices, and Patient’s Global Assessment (PGA) of OA. Study 1043 (NCT00994890)
was a long-term, noncontrolled safety study of tanezumab (ie, 2.5, 5, and 10
mg) subcutaneously administered every 8 weeks. Both studies were discontinued
prematurely due to a US Food and Drug Administration partial clinical
hold.
Results: Due to the clinical hold, Study 1027 was underpowered, and no
statistical analyses were performed. Mean (standard error [SE]) change from
baseline to week 8 in WOMAC Pain in tanezumab groups ranged from −3.59 (0.26)
to −3.89 (0.32), versus −2.74 (0.25) with placebo. Mean (SE) change from
baseline to week 8 in WOMAC Physical Function ranged from −3.13 (0.25) to −3.51
(0.28) with tanezumab and was −2.26 (0.24) with placebo. PGA mean (SE) change
from baseline to week 8 ranged from −0.90 (0.11) to −1.08 (0.12) with tanezumab
and was −0.78 (0.10) with placebo. Similar effectiveness was associated with
tanezumab in Study 1043. Few patients in either study (1.4%–5.2%) discontinued
due to adverse events. Five patients required total joint replacements in Study
1027 (placebo, n=2 [2.8%]; tanezumab 2.5 mg, n=3 [4.1%]) and 34 patients in
Study 1043 (tanezumab 2.5 mg, n=11 [4.8%]; tanezumab 5 mg, n=8 [3.6%];
tanezumab 10 mg, n=15 [6.6%]).
Conclusion: Preliminary results show similar efficacy and safety for both SC
and IV administration of tanezumab based on the direct comparisons reported
here and indirect comparisons with published results, confirming
pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling predictions.
Keywords: tanezumab, subcutaneous, osteoarthritis, efficacy, safety