已发表论文

替考拉宁剂量、谷浓度及对中重度革兰氏阳性感染患者疗效和安全性之间关系的回顾性分析

 

Authors Zhou L, Gao Y, Cao W, Liu J, Guan H, Zhang H, Shi Y, Lv W, Cheng L

Received 30 July 2017

Accepted for publication 21 November 2017

Published 5 January 2018 Volume 2018:11 Pages 29—36

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S146961

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Suresh Antony

Objectives: Teicoplanin, an antibiotic, has poor clinical efficacy when using the current drug label’s recommended regimen, which is approved by the China Food and Drug Administration. This study explores the appropriate loading and maintenance doses of teicoplanin and evaluates the therapeutic target of teicoplanin trough concentration (minimum concentration [min]).
Subjects and methods: All patients treated with teicoplanin from February 2015 to August 2016 at Zhengzhou Central Hospital were screened for enrollment. A total of 113 subjects were included and then divided into four groups: A (received three to six doses at a loading dose of 400 mg at 12-hour intervals, followed by maintenance dosing of 400 mg/day), B (received three doses at a loading dose of 400 mg at 12-hour intervals, followed by maintenance dosing of 400 mg/day), C (received two doses at a loading dose of 400 mg at 12-hour intervals, followed by maintenance dosing of 200 mg/day), and D (received one to three doses at a loading dose of 400 mg at 12-hour intervals, followed by maintenance dosing of 200 mg/day). 
min values of teicoplanin were detected with high-performance liquid chromatography on day 4, 30 minutes before maintenance-dose administration. Teicoplanin min, efficacy, and safety were compared among the four groups.
Results: Mean 
min differed significantly among the four groups (A, 18.11±6.37 mg/L; B, 15.91±4.94 mg/L; C, 17.06±5.66 mg/L; D, 11.97±3.76 mg/L) (<0.001), with creatinine clearance of 89.62 (53.72–162.48), 49.66 (40.69–59.64), 27.17 (9.7–39.45), and 96.6 (17.63–394.73) mL/min, respectively. The ratio of loading dose for 3 days to creatinine clearance and serum min were significantly correlated (=0.59, P <0.001). The correlation between the estimated probability of success and teicoplanin min was assessed using binary logistic regression (OR 2.049, P <0.001). Hepatotoxicity- and nephrotoxicity-incidence rates did not significantly differ among the four groups (=0.859 and =0.949, respectively).
Conclusion: A loading dose of 400 mg at 12-hour intervals three to six times is needed to achieve the early target range (15–20 mg/L) and improve the clinical efficacy rate for normal-renal-function patients. It is urgently necessary to amend the drug label for the recommended regimen.
Keywords: teicoplanin, loading dose, serum trough concentration, efficacy, safety, Chinese drug label