论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Zhou L, Gao Y, Cao W, Liu J, Guan H, Zhang H, Shi Y, Lv W, Cheng L
Received 30 July 2017
Accepted for publication 21 November 2017
Published 5 January 2018 Volume 2018:11 Pages 29—36
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S146961
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Suresh Antony
Objectives: Teicoplanin, an antibiotic, has poor clinical efficacy when using
the current drug label’s recommended regimen, which is approved by the China
Food and Drug Administration. This study explores the appropriate loading and
maintenance doses of teicoplanin and evaluates the therapeutic target of
teicoplanin trough concentration (minimum concentration [C min]).
Subjects and methods: All patients treated with teicoplanin from
February 2015 to August 2016 at Zhengzhou Central Hospital were screened for enrollment.
A total of 113 subjects were included and then divided into four groups: A
(received three to six doses at a loading dose of 400 mg at 12-hour
intervals, followed by maintenance dosing of 400 mg/day), B (received three
doses at a loading dose of 400 mg at 12-hour intervals, followed by maintenance
dosing of 400 mg/day), C (received two doses at a loading dose of 400 mg
at 12-hour intervals, followed by maintenance dosing of 200 mg/day), and D
(received one to three doses at a loading dose of 400 mg at 12-hour intervals,
followed by maintenance dosing of 200 mg/day). C min values of teicoplanin were detected with
high-performance liquid chromatography on day 4, 30 minutes before
maintenance-dose administration. Teicoplanin C min, efficacy, and safety were compared among the
four groups.
Results: Mean C min differed significantly among the four groups
(A, 18.11±6.37 mg/L; B, 15.91±4.94 mg/L; C, 17.06±5.66 mg/L; D, 11.97±3.76
mg/L) (P <0.001), with creatinine
clearance of 89.62 (53.72–162.48), 49.66 (40.69–59.64), 27.17 (9.7–39.45), and
96.6 (17.63–394.73) mL/min, respectively. The ratio of loading dose for 3 days
to creatinine clearance and serum C min were significantly correlated (R =0.59, P <0.001).
The correlation between the estimated probability of success and
teicoplanin C min was
assessed using binary logistic regression (OR 2.049, P <0.001).
Hepatotoxicity- and nephrotoxicity-incidence rates did not significantly differ
among the four groups (P =0.859 and P =0.949, respectively).
Conclusion: A loading dose of 400 mg at 12-hour intervals
three to six times is needed to achieve the early target range (15–20 mg/L) and
improve the clinical efficacy rate for normal-renal-function patients. It is
urgently necessary to amend the drug label for the recommended regimen.
Keywords: teicoplanin,
loading dose, serum trough concentration, efficacy, safety, Chinese drug label