论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Tang WW, Wang H, Wang YM, Wang XW
Received 3 August 2017
Accepted for publication 14 November 2017
Published 20 December 2017 Volume 2018:11 Pages 1—8
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S148214
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Akshita Wason
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Ingrid Espinoza
Background: A
number of studies have investigated the roles of excision repair
cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1 ) gene
rs3212986 polymorphisms as potential biomarkers in gastric cancer (GC).
However, the results were inconsistent. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to
explore ERCC1 rs3212986 polymorphisms
in the chemotherapy response and clinical outcome of GC.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched up to July 28,
2017, for studies on the association between ERCC1 rs3212986
A/C polymorphisms and response to chemotherapy as well as overall survival time
of GC. A fixed-effect or random-effect model was used to calculate the pooled
odds ratios (ORs) based on the results from the heterogeneity tests.
Results: The result revealed that there was no significant association
between the ERCC1 rs3212986 A/C
polymorphism and response to chemotherapy in GC under comparison models (AA +
CA versus CC, OR 0.95, P =0.80, AA
versus CA, OR 0.85, P =0.55, AA versus
CC, OR 0.74, P =0.47). Further identification
suggested that ERCC1 rs3212986
A/C polymorphisms were not linked with the overall survival of GC (AA + CA
versus CC, OR 1.09, P =0.52, AA
versus CA, OR 1.05, P =0.85, AA versus
CC, OR 1.43, P =0.23).
Conclusion: Our meta-analysis indicated that the ERCC1 rs3212986
A/C polymorphism was not associated with response to chemotherapy or overall
survival time in GC. Well-designed studies with larger sample sizes and more
ethnic groups should be performed to further validate our results.
Keywords: ERCC1 , rs3212986, cancer,
polymorphism, meta-analysis, survival, prognoses