论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Gundersen KG, Potvin R
Received 23 June 2017
Accepted for publication 14 September 2017
Published 3 October 2017 Volume 2017:11 Pages 1791—1796
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S144675
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Amy Norman
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser
Purpose: The
purpose of this study was to provide clinical outcomes data related to
secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for the correction of residual
refractive error after cataract surgery.
Patients and
methods: A chart review was conducted
to identify all eyes implanted with the monofocal spherical or toric AddOn® secondary IOL. Data were collated from charts
where uncomplicated initial cataract surgery was completed. Measures of
interest included the original IOL implanted, the postoperative refractive
error (before secondary IOL implantation) and the associated corrected and
uncorrected visual acuities (VAs). Postoperative data of interest included the
residual refractive error, the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and
uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA).
Results: Refractive and VA data from 1 week to 3 months post-surgery were
available for 46 of 70 eyes implanted with a secondary IOL by one surgeon at
one practice between 4/15 and 3/17. There was a statistically significant
improvement in UCVA of about 2 lines after surgery (p <0.01),
with no change in BCVA (p =0.94). No eyes
lost a line of BCVA. There was a statistically significant reduction in the
absolute magnitude of the residual spherical equivalent refractive error (p <0.01). In the 10 cases with a
toric secondary IOL, there was a statistically significant reduction in
refractive cylinder (p <0.01).
Conclusion: The secondary IOL studied here appears to be a viable surgical option to
correct residual refractive error after primary IOL implantation.
Keywords: AddOn, piggyback, toric, astigmatism, multifocal, secondary IOL