已发表论文

诊断-干预包(DIP)支付改革对县级医院的影响:来自中国 Z 市的证据

 

Authors Peng X, Tan H, Chen Y

Received 27 July 2025

Accepted for publication 30 January 2026

Published 13 February 2026 Volume 2026:18 556559

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S556559

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Russell Taichman

Xinyi Peng,1 Huawei Tan,1,* Yingchun Chen1,2,* 

1Department of Health Management, School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China; 2Research Centre for Rural Health Service, Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences of Hubei Provincial Department of Education, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Yingchun Chen, Email chenyingchunhust@163.com Huawei Tan, Email tanhuawei-2009@163.com

Background: In 2020, China introduced an innovative case-based payment method called “Diagnosis-Intervention Packet (DIP).” However, the implementation of DIP may present significant challenges to county hospitals. Therefore, this study aims to assess the impact of DIP on inpatient Volume and inpatient medical revenue at county hospitals, as well as its effect on patient flow.
Methods: We collected detailed data on inpatient expenses and reimbursements from the Z City Medical Insurance Bureau for the years 2020– 2022, encompassing a total of 5,339,996 records. A single-group interrupted time series analysis was conducted to examine changes in inpatient volumes and their regional distribution across municipal hospitals, county hospitals, and primary healthcare institutions before and after the DIP reform. Additionally, the impact of the reform on medical revenue at county hospitals and its regional share was analyzed. Heterogeneity by insurance type was also explored.
Results: Following the implementation of the DIP reform, county hospitals experienced significant declines in both inpatient volume and inpatient medical revenue growth. Monthly inpatient visits decreased by 610.4 (p=0.063), with their market share dropping 0.28% (p=0.003). The impact was particularly pronounced for patients with Urban-Rural Residents Basic Medical Insurance (URRBMI), where monthly volume fell by 1,228.13 (p=0.012) and share decreased by 0.39% (p< 0.001). Inpatient medical revenue growth reversed significantly, with the slope decreasing 3.58% (p=0.014) and regional share falling 0.38% (p=0.008).
Conclusion: DIP implementation creates significant challenges for county hospitals through patient diversion to primary facilities and increased competition with municipal hospitals. This threatens to create a cycle of declining volume, revenue, and capabilities. To prevent rural patients from being forced to seek care at distant urban facilities, policy interventions should focus on providing targeted support to maintain county hospitals’ vital role in rural healthcare delivery.

Keywords: DIP, case-based payment system, county hospitals, inpatient volume, medical revenue