已发表论文

基于 Omaha 系统的 PCI 术后康复护理评价指标的应用和 Delphi 验证

 

Authors Wu L, Gong Y, Liu X, Ning Y, Song J, Zhang Z, Zhou H, Xiong H

Received 8 August 2025

Accepted for publication 20 January 2026

Published 13 February 2026 Volume 2026:19 559427

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S559427

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 4

Editor who approved publication: Professor Charles V Pollack

Lili Wu,1 Yahui Gong,1 Xueli Liu,1 Yaqian Ning,1 Jianlan Song,1 Zhifu Zhang,1 Hairong Zhou,1 Haiyan Xiong2 

1General Medicine Department, People’s Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, 518109, People’s Republic of China; 2Nursing Department, People’s Hospital of Longhua, Shenzhen, 518109, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Haiyan Xiong, Nursing Department, People’s Hospital of Longhua, No. 38 Jinglong Construction Road, Shenzhen, 518109, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-13713832572, Email xhy_3111@163.com Hairong Zhou, General Medicine Department, People’s Hospital of Longhua, No. 38 Jinglong Construction Road, Shenzhen, 518109, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-15012613566, Email 54574963@qq.com

Background: This study aimed to develop an evaluation index system based on the Omaha System to identify postoperative rehabilitation nursing problems in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This evaluation system aims to facilitate the timely identification of nursing problems and enhance the reliability of nursing interventions during postoperative rehabilitation.
Methods: Rehabilitation nursing problems were identified through a comprehensive literature review and case analysis, considering both the physical and psychological characteristics of post-PCI patients. These problems were classified and organized according to the Omaha System. From September 2020 to February 2021, Delphi consultations were conducted with experts in China to finalize the evaluation indicators.
Results: After two rounds of expert consultation, the authority coefficients of the experts were 0.858 and 0.875, and Kendall’s W coefficients were 0.194 and 0.150, respectively (both P < 0.01), indicating consensus. The final evaluation index system comprised 4 first-level indicators (domains), 21 second-level indicators (nursing problems), and 130 third-level indicators (specific symptoms/signs).
Conclusion: The Omaha System-based evaluation index developed in this study offers a clinically applicable framework for identifying and managing rehabilitation nursing problems in PCI patients. Supporting comprehensive and systematic assessment provides nurses with clear guidance for problem recognition, individualized care planning, and outcome monitoring. Its application has the potential to enhance care consistency, improve patient recovery, and promote evidence-based nursing decision-making, thereby contributing to improved quality of post-PCI rehabilitation care in clinical practice.

Keywords: coronary heart disease, percutaneous coronary intervention, Omaha System, index system, Delphi method, cardiovascular nursing, nursing care