已发表论文

电针作为尼古丁依赖的非药物干预手段:来自一项随机临床试验的证据

 

Authors Lai Z, Fan Q, Lee AL, Yao X , Dai R, Liang Y

Received 5 September 2025

Accepted for publication 19 December 2025

Published 30 December 2025 Volume 2025:21 Pages 1869—1885

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S565463

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Professor Garry Walsh

Zhen Lai,1,* Qian Fan,2,* Ai Ling Lee,3 Xujing Yao,3 Ranran Dai,4 Yan Liang2 

1TCM Department, Jiading District Central Hospital Affiliated Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 2Acupuncture Department, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 3Acupuncture Department, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 4Pneumology Department, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Yan Liang, Acupuncture Department, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China, Email dr.liangy@163.com

Abstract: Nicotine dependence, a chronic addictive disorder characterized by high relapse rates, represents a significant global public health challenge. This study employed a randomized, single-blind, parallel-group controlled design to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture compared with varenicline in the treatment of nicotine dependence. The results demonstrated that electroacupuncture achieved significantly superior outcomes across multiple key outcome measures relative to varenicline: the electroacupuncture group exhibited a greater mean daily reduction in Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) scores (− 1.11 points/day vs − 0.33 points/day, P < 0.001) and a higher rate of sustained improvement at the 3-month follow-up (84.4% vs 69.5%). With respect to the Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI), the electroacupuncture group showed a more rapid and sustained decline (sustained rate: 81.7% vs 63.9%, P = 0.002). Moreover, electroacupuncture demonstrated significant advantages in alleviating nicotine withdrawal symptoms (sustained rate: 75.3% vs 52.8%, P = 0.026) and reducing daily cigarette consumption (79.0% vs 56.2%, P < 0.001). The potential mechanism may involve modulation of the mesolimbic dopamine system. These findings support electroacupuncture as a safe, effective, and sustainable non-pharmacological intervention for smoking cessation, particularly suitable for individuals with high nicotine dependence who are sensitive to adverse drug reactions or exhibit poor medication adherence, and suggest its potential role as a complementary or alternative strategy in clinical smoking cessation programs. Future research should further validate its long-term efficacy and investigate the neurobiological mechanisms underlying its effects on relapse prevention.

Keywords: electroacupuncture, nicotine dependence, smoking cessation, varenicline, withdrawal symptoms, randomized controlled trial