已发表论文

角膜塑形镜偏心对眼部及生物力学测量的影响

 

Authors Hu X, Zhao C, Lu W, Tian Y, Jiang D, Ding W, Leng L 

Received 7 August 2025

Accepted for publication 1 December 2025

Published 31 December 2025 Volume 2025:19 Pages 4957—4966

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S558988

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser

Xiuli Hu,1,* Chenpei Zhao,2– 4,* Weicong Lu,5 Yuyin Tian,2– 4 Dongdong Jiang,2– 4 Wenzhi Ding,2– 4 Lin Leng2– 4 

1Experimental Teaching of Clinical Skills Center, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China; 2Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao, Shandong, People’s Republic of China; 3Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Qingdao, Shandong, People’s Republic of China; 4School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao, Shandong, People’s Republic of China; 5School of Optometry and Ophthalmology, The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Lin Leng, Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, No. 5, Yanerdao Road, Qingdao, Shandong, 266071, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-0532-87610198, Email coollin.1987@163.com

Purpose: To investigate the effects of orthokeratology (ortho-K) lens decentration on ocular and biomechanical parameters and analyze the correlation of these parameters with decentration distance.
Methods: Thirty eyes of 30 myopic adult subjects, mean age 28.2 years who had worn ortho-K lens for two hours were recruited for this prospective study. Under both the central and eccentric lens fitting conditions, the subjects underwent two rounds of assessments with a week-long interval. The ocular parameters were measured by an IOL Master, whereas the biomechanical parameters were measured by a Corves ST. Differences between measurements were evaluated by one-way ANOVA and a post hoc test. Repeatability was analyzed based on within-subject standard deviation (Sw), repeatability coefficient (RC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and correlation of variation (CoV). Pearson correlation analysis was employed for correlation analysis.
Results: The ocular parameters showed no significant differences, whereas among the biomechanical parameters, the biomechanical corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) (95% CI 15.8– 16.7 mmHg, 14.7– 15.6 mmHg, 14.5– 15.5 mmHg for baseline, central and eccentric group) and stiffness parameter at first applanation (SPA1) (95% CI 111.7– 122.4, 102.3– 113.0, 103.9– 115.1 for baseline, central and eccentric group) showed significant changes after ortho-K. In all groups, the ocular parameters showed good repeatability with ICC values greater than 0.95 and CoV values lower than 1.3%. By contrast, the biomechanical parameters showed poor repeatability with low ICC values (ie, below 0.7) for the length of flattened cornea at the first and second applanations (A1L and A2L, respectively) and for velocity of corneal apex at the second applanation (A2V) in the baseline group; for A1L, A2L, and bIOP in the central group; and for A1L and A2V in the eccentric group. The correlation analysis showed the positive relationship in A2L between central and eccentric groups.
Conclusion: Ortho-K lens decentration did not influence the ocular parameters. However, the biomechanical parameters, the bIOP and SPA1 related to corneal thickness changed after ortho-K.

Keywords: orthokeratology, decentration, biomechanical parameters, axial length