已发表论文

艾司氯胺酮-利多卡因用于老年择期手术患者麻醉诱导的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验

 

Authors Xu J , Yuan M, Zhou T , Zhang M, Li Y 

Received 21 August 2025

Accepted for publication 31 October 2025

Published 6 November 2025 Volume 2025:19 Pages 9943—9953

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S562226

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Professor Anastasios Lymperopoulos

Jinhui Xu, Mailong Yuan, Tao Zhou, Mingsheng Zhang, Yaqi Li

Department of Anesthesiology, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Yaqi Li, Department of Anesthesiology, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, People’s Republic of China, Email tfmqdoc@163.com

Background: Esketamine, the S-enantiomer of ketamine, has sympathomimetic and analgesic properties. Intravenous lidocaine provides sedative and analgesic adjuvant effects and blunts airway reflexes during anesthesia induction. However, the role of their combination in elderly patients remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of esketamine–lidocaine–propofol induction with those of sufentanil–propofol induction in this population.
Methods: In this prospective, double-blind, randomized trial, 116 elderly patients undergoing elective surgery were assigned to receive esketamine (0.5 mg·kg− 1), lidocaine (1.5 mg·kg− 1), and propofol (Group E) or sufentanil (0.4 μg·kg− 1) and propofol (Group S) for anesthesia induction. The primary outcomes were the incidence of hypotension and the absolute area under the curve (AUC) of mean arterial pressure (MAP) deviation, measured during anesthesia induction (from the initiation of anesthetic drug administration to 5 minutes after tracheal intubation).
Results: The absolute AUC for Group E was smaller than that for Group S (93.83 [79.74– 130.78] mmHg·min vs.147.50 [99.38– 210.62] mmHg·min), with a median difference of − 51.09 mmHg·min (95% confidence interval (CI), − 84.53– − 14.00; P = 0.005). The incidence of hypotension in the Group E was lower than Group S (62.1% vs 82.8%), with a relative risk of 0.750 (95% CI, 0.594– 0.947; P = 0.013). The incidence of coughing (P < 0.001) and total phenylephrine dose (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in Group E than Group S, whereas BIS values at 2– 5 minutes post-intubation were significantly higher (P < 0.05). There were no serious adverse events in either group.
Conclusion: Esketamine–lidocaine–propofol improved hemodynamic stability and reduced adverse events compared with sufentanil–propofol, supporting its use for anesthesia induction in elderly patients.

Keywords: esketamine, lidocaine, elderly patients, induction