已发表论文

患者导航在结直肠癌筛查中的应用:一项范围综述

 

Authors Xia H, Wang J, Cheng C, Jiang Q, Guo T , Shen D, Geng H, Zhang T, Duan H

Received 30 July 2025

Accepted for publication 22 October 2025

Published 30 October 2025 Volume 2025:17 Pages 2541—2551

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S556285

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Bilikere Dwarakanath

Hongyan Xia,1,* Jiaxuan Wang,2,* Cancan Cheng,1 Qian Jiang,1 Tongtong Guo,1 Dingdan Shen,1 Hu Geng,1 Tingting Zhang,1 Huaqing Duan1 

1School of Nursing, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Acupuncture, Shenzhen Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Huaqing Duan, School of Nursing, Gannan Medical University, No. 1, Hexie Avenue, Rongjiang New District, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, People’s Republic of China, Email 68019401@qq.com

Background: The global incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer are rising annually, posing a severe threat to public health. Studies have shown that patient navigation can significantly improve adherence to colorectal cancer screening, thereby reducing incidence and mortality rates. This review aims to summarize the existing evidence on the application of patient navigation in colorectal cancer screening, to provide an evidence-based foundation for subsequent research and clinical practice.
Methods: Based on Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review methodological framework, a search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, and SinoMed for relevant studies published from database inception to May 20, 2025.
Results: 25 studies were included. The findings indicate that navigator types primarily include trained professional navigators, medical navigators, and novel navigators. Service delivery methods were diverse, with telephone navigation being the primary mode, often combined with SMS, face-to-face, email, and other multi-modal collaborative interventions. Navigation service content encompassed six main themes: colorectal cancer education, barrier assessment and resolution, guidance and reminders for guaiac fecal occult blood test/fecal immunochemical test and bowel preparation, colonoscopy process management, and post-examination follow-up. Efficacy evaluation demonstrated that patient navigation overall enhances colorectal cancer screening adherence, although heterogeneity existed in outcomes such as bowel preparation quality and patient satisfaction.
Conclusion: Current patient navigation services for colorectal cancer screening have formed a relatively mature intervention framework. However, there remains room for optimization in areas like the balance of service content and support for non-medical barriers. Future practice can draw upon existing research to implement full-cycle, culturally adapted, and cost-effective patient navigation interventions tailored to national contexts.

Keywords: patient navigation, colorectal cancer, colonoscopy, guaiac fecal occult blood test, fecal immunochemical test, scoping review