已发表论文

Phenytoin and carbamazepine in trigeminal neuralgia: marketing-based versus evidence-based treatment

 

Authors Keppel Hesselink JM, Schatman ME

Received 16 May 2017

Accepted for publication 17 May 2017

Published 17 July 2017 Volume 2017:10 Pages 1663—1666

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S141896

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Introduction
Most review articles support carbamazepine as a first-line pharmacotherapy for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia.
1–3 However, the empirical support for this recommendation is somewhat suspect. Phenytoin, as the prototype for all anticonvulsants, was already positioned as an analgesic compound 70 years ago. Since these initial findings, the data that have been gathered have supported the use of anticonvulsants as painkillers – from phenytoin up to and including more recent anticonvulsants such as gabapentin and pregabalin. Since 1942, a number of papers supported phenytoin’s therapeutic effects in trigeminal neuralgia (Table 1). The introduction of carbamazepine in 1962 by Geigy shifted the interest of neurologists from phenytoin as a treatment for trigeminal neuralgia to carbamazepine, without sound scientific evidence. To date, no convincing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been published supporting the role of carbamazepine in trigeminal neuralgia, and we could not identify a single study comparing the effects of phenytoin with those of carbamazepine. Accordingly, phenytoin should probably be considered more often as a viable therapy for (treatmentresistant) trigeminal neuralgia.