论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Nielsen MG, Ørnbøl E, Bech P, Vestergaard M, Christensen KS
Received 21 January 2017
Accepted for publication 16 March 2017
Published 6 July 2017 Volume 2017:9 Pages 355—365
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S132913
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Akshita Wason
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Irene Petersen
Background: The Major Depression Inventory (MDI) is widely used in Danish general
practice as a screening tool to assess depression in symptomatic patients.
Nevertheless, no validation studies of the MDI have been performed. The aim of
this study was to validate the web-based version of the MDI against a fully
structured telephone interview in a population selected on clinical suspicion
of depression (ie, presence of two or three core symptoms of depression) in
general practice.
Materials and
methods: General practitioners (GPs) invited
consecutive persons suspected of depression to complete the web-based MDI in a
primary care setting. The validation was based on the Munich-Composite
International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI) by phone. GPs in the 22 practices
in our study included 132 persons suspected of depression. Depression was rated
as yes/no according to the MDI and M-CIDI. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive
predictive value of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth
Revision (ICD-10) algorithms of the MDI were examined.
Results: According to the M-CIDI interview, 87.9% of the included
population was depressed and 64.4% was severely depressed. According to the MDI
scale, 59.1% of the population was depressed and 31.8% was severely depressed.
The sensitivity of the MDI for depression was 62.1% (95% confidence interval
[95% CI]: 52.6–70.9) and the specificity was 62.5% (95% CI: 35.4–84.8). The sensitivity
for severe depression was 42.2% (95% CI: 30.6–52.4) and the specificity was
85.1% (95% CI: 71.7–93.8). The receiver operating curve showed an area under
the curve of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.52–0.81) for any depression and of 0.72 (95% CI:
0.63–0.81) for severe depression.
Conclusion: The MDI is a conservative instrument for diagnosing ICD-10 depression in
a clinical setting compared to the M-CIDI interview. Only a few false-positive
diagnoses were identified when the MDI was used on clinical suspicion of depression.
Keywords: Major Depression Inventory, depression, criterion validity, M-CIDI
interview, diagnosing