论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
中国大陆妊娠期糖尿病的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Authors Xia L, Yang Z, Mu Q, Ji Y, Lyu J
Received 24 October 2024
Accepted for publication 28 January 2025
Published 22 February 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 565—581
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S502043
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Ernesto Maddaloni
Linjuan Xia,1 Zehua Yang,2 Qincai Mu,3 Yulin Ji,1 Juncheng Lyu4
1College of Nursing, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan, 671000, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second People’s Hospital of Dali City, Dali, Yunnan, 671003, People’s Republic of China; 3Department of Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dali University, Dali, Yunnan, 671000, People’s Republic of China; 4School of Public Health, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, 261053, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Juncheng Lyu, Email cheng_china@163.com
Objective: This study aimed to identify and evaluate risk factors associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in mainland China.
Methods: Eight electronic databases were searched for literature published from January 2010 until December 2023. Heterogeneity was quantified using I2. Data were pooled by fixed or random effects models and expressed as odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals.
Results: A total of 69 observational studies with an overall sample size of 2,138,032 Chinese women and 219,303 patients with GDM were included in the analysis. After adjusting confounders, older maternal age (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.09– 1.15), maternal age ≥ 35 years (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.74– 2.21), higher pre-pregnancy body mass index (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.17– 1.32), pre-pregnancy overweight (OR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.64– 1.92) or obesity (OR 2.52, 95% CI: 2.06– 3.08), family history of diabetes (OR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.58– 2.17), history of GDM (OR = 4.09, 95% CI: 2.13– 7.82), and elevated levels of fasting plasma glucose (OR = 2.54, 95% CI: 2.13– 3.01), hemoglobin (OR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.14– 1.89) and serum triglycerides (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.31– 2.16) in early pregnancy were associated with an increased risk of GDM in mainland China. But gravidity ≥ 2 (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.89– 1.27), conception by assisted reproductive technology analyses (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.95– 2.51) were not associated with GDM, and parity ≥ 1 (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.82– 0.94) was related to lower risk of GDM. In available unadjusted studies, history of abortion (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.31– 1.37) increased risk of GDM, non-Han ethnicity (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.59– 1.03) and high school or lower education level (OR1.09, 95% CI: 0.94– 1.26) showed no correlation with GDM.
Conclusion: The key risk factors for GDM in mainland China included older maternal age, maternal age ≥ 35 years, pre-pregnancy overweight or obesity, family history of diabetes, history of GDM, elevated levels of FPG, Hb, and serum TG in early pregnancy. Early identification and intervention for women at high risk should be performed to prevent the development of GDM.
Keywords: gestational diabetes mellitus, risk factors, mainland China, systematic review, meta-analysis