已发表论文

预防性鞘内或硬膜外注射生理盐水预防硬脊膜穿刺后硬脊膜穿刺后头痛的有效性和安全性:一项荟萃分析和系统评价

 

Authors Jing W, Ma Y, Wan Y, Li H 

Received 12 September 2024

Accepted for publication 5 February 2025

Published 26 February 2025 Volume 2025:18 Pages 915—927

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S494237

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Alexandre F DaSilva

Weiwei Jing, Yushan Ma, Yantong Wan, Hao Li

Department of Anesthesiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China

Correspondence: Hao Li, Department of Anesthesiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People’s Republic of China, Tel/Fax +86 028 85503753, Email lihao0510@163.com

Background: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is the most common and troublesome complication following iatrogenic puncture of the dura. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrathecal or epidural saline injection to prevent PDPH.
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, supplemented by a manual search of reference lists of related articles. Studies were eligible if they compared intrathecal or epidural injection or continuous saline infusion with no intervention in patients with accidental or intentional dural puncture. Trials reporting PDPH outcomes were considered eligible. The type of surgeries and patient populations were not restricted. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the risk estimate of dichotomous outcomes. The funnel plot, Egger, and Begg tests were performed to assess the publication bias.
Results: We identified 13 studies involving 1589 patients, revealing a high publication bias. Normal saline injection reduced the incidence of PDPH (RR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.74, P< 0.0001, I2=66%, P-heterogeneity=0.0004) and the requirement for an epidural blood patch (RR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.54, P< 0.00001, I2=29%, P-heterogeneity=0.23).
Conclusion: Saline administration after dural puncture appears to be a promising option for preventing PDPH. However, heterogeneity among the studies and publication bias with positive results limits the available evidence. Therefore, further large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings.
Register: CRD42022342509.

Keywords: dural puncture, saline, post-dural puncture headache, meta-analysis