论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
探索骨关节感染的微生物景观:使用16S rRNA宏基因组测序分析
Authors Maimaiti Z , Liu L
Received 7 August 2024
Accepted for publication 2 December 2024
Published 13 December 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 5557—5566
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S482931
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Professor Sandip Patil
Zulipikaer Maimaiti, Liang Liu
Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 101149, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Liang Liu, Email Liuliang@ccmu.edu.cn
Background: Bone and joint infections (BJIs) are challenging to diagnose. This study evaluated the utility of 16S rRNA gene sequencing in diagnosing BJIs, comparing it with conventional bacterial culture to explore microbial diversity in orthopedic infections.
Methods: Thirty patients with BJIs were enrolled from January 2019 to September 2020 at a single orthopedic center. Diagnoses were based on the Musculoskeletal Infection Society standards. DNA extraction, 16S rRNA sequencing, and microbial composition analysis were performed. Conventional bacterial culture results were compared with metagenomics detection, and associations with blood routine and biochemical test factors were analyzed.
Results: The study enrolled 30 patients with BJIs. Traditional bacterial culture successfully identified pathogens in 60% (18/30) of cases, predominantly Staphylococcus aureus. In contrast, 16S rRNA metagenomics sequencing revealed distinct microorganisms in all cases, it unveiled a diverse microbial landscape. The correlation between bacterial culture and metagenomics detection showcased both concordance and discrepancies. Consistency of detection between the two methods showed that metagenomics detection detected the same genus or species in 14 (87.5%) of the 16 samples identified as species by bacterial culture. In nearly half of the patients with negative cultures, pathogenic microorganisms were detected, highlighting the capability of 16S rRNA sequencing to identify microorganisms, even in samples with negative or unidentified culture results. Moreover, no significant correlation was observed between bacterial culture, metagenomics detection and the factors of blood routine and biochemical test.
Conclusion: This study deepens our understanding of the microbial complexity in BJIs. While traditional culture methods are cost-effective and practical, 16S rRNA gene sequencing proves valuable for complementary microbial analysis, particularly when traditional methods fail or rapid identification is critical. This emerging diagnostic approach can enhance the accuracy and speed of pathogen identification, enabling more effective interventions in the management of BJIs.
Keywords: bone and joint infections, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, microbial complexity, diagnostic tool, clinical management