已发表论文

TikTok和Bilibili上胃食管反流病的视频质量评估和分析:横断面研究

 

Authors Liang Y , Xia J, Huo W, Liu B, Wang Z, Ding Y, Wu K 

Received 20 September 2024

Accepted for publication 5 December 2024

Published 11 December 2024 Volume 2024:17 Pages 5927—5939

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S485781

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Pavani Rangachari

Ying Liang,1,2,* Jianlei Xia,1,* Wenting Huo,1,2 Bangjie Liu,1 Zhangyu Wang,1 Yanbing Ding,1,2 Keyan Wu1 

1Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China; 2School of Nursing and School of Public Health, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Keyan Wu; Yanbing Ding, Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, No. 368 hanjiang Middle Road, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, 225012, People’s Republic of China, Email kywu@yzu.edu.cn; ybding@yzu.edu.cn

Aims and Objectives: To assess the content quality and reliability of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) videos on TikTok and Bilibili.
Background: Since many people with GERD use current online platforms to search for health information, there is a need to assess the quality of GERD videos on social media. There are many GERD videos on TikTok and Bilibili; however, the quality of information in these videos remains unknown.
Design: A cross-sectional survey on two video platforms.
Methods: In November 2023, we retrieved 200 videos from TikTok and Bilibili with the search term “GERD.” Basic video information was extracted, the content coded, and the video source identified. Two independent raters assessed the quality of each video using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) tool.
Results: A total of 156 videos were collected. Most of the videos on TikTok and Bilibili came from gastroenterologists. TikTok’s GERD video quality and reliability were higher than Bilibili’s. The mDISCERN and GQS scores of both platforms were positively correlated with duration, and the GQS score was positively correlated with collection and shares. Bilibili’s JAMA score was negatively correlated with time-sync comments, and TikTok’s JAMA score was negatively correlated with days since upload.
Conclusion: This study indicated that the content quality scores of TikTok and Bilibili as sources of scientific information on GERD are average, and patients should carefully identify and select to watch GERD-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili.
Relevance to Clinical Practice: By evaluating the quality of videos on GERD on the two platforms, this can provide new ideas for health education interventions in the clinic and a relevant basis for improving the quality level of the videos.

Keywords: gastroesophageal reflux disease, health education, social media, online video, quality, online health information-seeking