论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Luan S, Wan H, Wang S, Li H, Zhang B
Received 11 November 2016
Accepted for publication 20 December 2016
Published 27 February 2017 Volume 2017:13 Pages 609—620
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S127453
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Prof. Dr. Roumen Kirov
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Professor Wai Kwong Tang
Background: Whether olanzapine/fluoxetine combination (OFC) is superior to
olanzapine or fluoxetine monotherapy in patients with treatment-resistant
depression (TRD) remains controversial. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis
of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy and safety of
OFC with olanzapine or fluoxetine monotherapy for patients with TRD.
Materials and methods: RCTs published in PubMed,
Embase, Web of Science, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were systematically
reviewed to assess the efficacy and safety of OFC. Outcomes included mean
changes from baseline in Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS),
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety
(HAM-A), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) scores, response rate, remission
rate, and adverse events. Results were expressed with weighted mean difference
(WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs.
Results: A total of five RCTs with 3,020 patients met the
inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with
olanzapine or fluoxetine monotherapy, OFC was associated with greater changes
from baseline in MADRS (WMD =-3.37, 95% CI: -4.76, -1.99; P <0.001), HAM-A (WMD =-1.82,
95% CI: -2.25, -1.40; P <0.001), CGI-S
(WMD =-0.37, 95% CI: -0.45, -0.28; P <0.001), and
BPRS scores (WMD =-1.46, 95% CI: -2.16, -0.76; P <0.001).
Moreover, OFC had significantly higher response rate (RR =1.35, 95% CI:
1.12, 1.63; P =0.001) and remission rate
(RR =1.71, 95% CI: 1.31, 2.23; P <0.001). The incidence of
treatment-related adverse events was similar between the OFC and monotherapy
groups (RR =1.01, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.08; P =0.834).
Conclusion: OFC is more effective than olanzapine or fluoxetine
monotherapy in the treatment of patients with TRD. Our results provided
supporting evidence for the use of OFC in TRD. However, considering the
limitations in this study, more large-scale, well-designed RCTs are needed to
confirm these findings.
Keywords: treatment-resistant depression,
olanzapine, fluoxetine, meta-analysis