论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
Authors Tian D, Wang X, Zong H, Zhang Y
Received 13 September 2016
Accepted for publication 10 November 2016
Published 20 February 2017 Volume 2017:12 Pages 405—412
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S122273
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Lucy Goodman
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Zhi-Ying Wu
Background: We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of
short-term (≤6 months) and long-term (>6 months), regular (OaD)
and on-demand (PRN) regimens of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is)
in treating erectile dysfunction (ED) after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy
(NSRP).
Methods: We conducted a literature search in August 2016. Sources included
PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases. The main outcome was International Index
of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain score, and the
secondary outcome was treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
Results: Eight articles involving 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were
used in this analysis: they suggested that PDE5-Is can improve the IIEF-EF
distinctly in comparison with placebo in short and long term (mean difference
[MD]: 2.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45–3.08, P <0.00001, and
MD: 4.5, 95% CI: 3.6–5.4, P <0.00001), and long-term use
of PDE5-Is (>6 months) can improve the IIEF-EF distinctly in comparison
with short-term use of PDE5-Is (≤6 months) (MD: 3.9, 95% CI: 3.01–4.8, P <0.00001). OaD
of PDE5-Is significantly improved the IIEF-EF compared to placebo in short and
long term (MD: 4.08, 95% CI: 3.2–4.97, P <0.00001, and MD: 4.74, 95%
CI: 3.79–5.69, P <0.00001). No significant
differences were found in IIEF-EF changes between PRN and placebo
(≤6 months) (MD: 2.64, 95% CI: −0.87 to 6.14, P =0.14), and
between PRN and OaD group (>6 months) (MD: −0.58, 95% CI: −9.86 to
8.74, P =0.91).
There were more TEAEs in PDE5-Is group in comparison with placebo (odds ratio
[OR]: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.26–1.91, P <0.0001), and TEAEs in OaD
group were not significantly different from those seen in PRN group (OR: 1.05,
95% CI: 0.78–1.4, P =0.77).
Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggests that PDE5-Is are efficient and safe for
treatment of ED after NSRP, and we should choose the regular regimen for short
term and regular or on-demand regimen for long term. Further high-quality RCTs
are needed to validate this result.
Keywords: erectile dysfunction, meta-analysis, nerve-sparing radical
prostatectomy, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors