已发表论文

通过生物信息学和胶质母细胞瘤实验鉴定细胞相关基因中的关键细胞

 

Authors Zhang F, Ye J, Zhu J, Qian W, Wang H, Luo C

Received 25 April 2024

Accepted for publication 27 August 2024

Published 5 September 2024 Volume 2024:16 Pages 1109—1130

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S475513

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Harikrishna Nakshatri

Fenglin Zhang,* Jingliang Ye,* Junle Zhu, Wenbo Qian, Haoheng Wang, Chun Luo

Department of Neurosurgery, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Chun Luo, Email luoc_sh@sina.com

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the roles of cell-in-cell (CIC)-related genes in glioblastoma (GBM) using bioinformatics and experimental strategies.
Patients and Methods: The ssGSEA algorithm was used to calculate the CIC score for each patient. Subsequently, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the CIClow and CIChigh groups and between the tumor and control samples were screened using the limma R package. Key CIC-related genes (CICRGs) were further filtered using univariate Cox and LASSO analyses, followed by the construction of a CIC-related risk score model. The performance of the risk score model in predicting GBM prognosis was evaluated using ROC curves and an external validation cohort. Moreover, their location and differentiation trajectory in GBM were analyzed at the single-cell level using the Seurat R package. Finally, the expression of key CICRGs in clinical samples was examined by qPCR.
Results: In the current study, we found that CIC scorelow group had a significantly better survival in the TCGA-GBM cohort, supporting the important role of CICRGs in GBM. Using univariate Cox and LASSO analyses, PTX3, TIMP1, IGFBP2, SNCAIP, LOXL1, SLC47A2, and LGALS3 were identified as key CICRGs. Based on this data, a CIC-related prognostic risk score model was built using the TCGA-GBM cohort and validated in the CGGA-GBM cohort. Further mechanistic analyses showed that the CIC-related risk score is closely related to immune and inflammatory responses. Interestingly, at the single-cell level, key CICRGs were expressed in the neurons and myeloids of tumor tissues and exhibited unique temporal dynamics of expression changes. Finally, the expression of key CICRGs was validated by qPCR using clinical samples from GBM patients.
Conclusion: We identified novel CIC-related genes and built a reliable prognostic prediction model for GBM, which will provide further basic clues for studying the exact molecular mechanisms of GBM pathogenesis from a CIC perspective.

Keywords: glioblastoma, bioinformatics, cell-in-cell, prognosis