已发表论文

转录组学分析辅助代谢组学策略,以识别与结核病相关的潜在生物标志物

 

Authors Jiang J, Li Z, Chen C, Jiang W, Xu B, Zhao Q 

Received 2 August 2021

Accepted for publication 28 October 2021

Published 15 November 2021 Volume 2021:14 Pages 4795—4807

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S330493

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Suresh Antony

Purpose: To investigate the dysregulated pathways and identify reliable diagnostic biomarkers for tuberculosis using integrated analysis of metabolomics and transcriptomics.
Methods: Three groups of samples, untargeted metabolomics analysis of healthy controls (HC), latent tuberculosis infection patients (LTBI), and active tuberculosis patients (TB), were analyzed using gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOF MS) and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-quantitative mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QE-MS). Both univariate and multivariate and statistical analyses were used to select differential metabolites (DMs) among group comparison, and LASSO regression analysis was employed to discover potential diagnostic biomarkers. Metabolite set enrichment analysis was performed to identify the altered metabolic pathways specifically in patients with TB. Meanwhile, a transcriptomic dataset GSEG4992 was downloaded from the GEO database to explore the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between TB and HC identified in significantly enriched pathways. Finally, an integrative analysis of DMs and DEGs was performed to investigate the possible molecular mechanisms of TB.
Results: Thirty-three specific metabolites were significantly different between TB and HC, of which 7 (5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, isoleucyl-isoleucine, heptadecanoic acid, indole acetaldehyde, 5-ethyl-2,4-dimethyloxazole, and 2-hydroxycaproic acid, unknown 71) were chosen as combinational potential biomarkers for TB. The area under the curve (AUC) value of these biomarkers was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92– 1.00). Metabolites set enrichment analysis (MSEA) displayed that there were 3 significantly enriched pathways among all. The genes in 3 significantly enriched pathways were further analyzed, of which 9(ALDH3B1, BCAT1, BCAT2, GLYAT, GOT1, IL4I1, MIF, SDS, SDSL) were expressed differentially. The area under the curve (AUC) values of these DEGs enriched in pathways mostly were greater than 0.8. As a result, a connected network of metabolites and genes in the pathways were established, which provides insights into the credibility of selected metabolites.
Conclusion: The newly identified metabolic biomarkers display a high potential to be developed into a promising tool for TB screening, diagnosis, and therapeutic effect monitoring.
Keywords: biomarker, diagnostic, metabolites, genes, multi-omics