论文已发表
注册即可获取德孚的最新动态
IF 收录期刊
在历史队列研究中看到的增量血液透析的好处
Authors Chen W, Wang M, Zhang M, Zhang W, Shi J, Weng J, Huang B, Kalantar-Zadeh K , Chen J
Received 6 August 2021
Accepted for publication 25 October 2021
Published 13 November 2021 Volume 2021:17 Pages 1177—1186
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S332218
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. De Yun Wang
Purpose: Previous research on incremental hemodialysis transition has mainly focused on one or two benefits or prognoses. We aimed to conduct a comprehensive analysis by investigating whether incremental hemodialysis was simultaneously associated with adequate dialysis therapy, stable complication indicators, long-lasting arteriovenous vascular access, and long-lasting preservation of residual kidney function (RKF) without increasing mortality or hospitalization.
Patients and Methods: Incident hemodialysis patients from Huashan Hospital in Shanghai, China, over the period of 2012 to 2019, were enrolled and followed every three months until death or the time of censoring. Changes in complication indicators from baseline to all post-baseline visits were analyzed by mixed-effects models. The outcomes of RKF loss, arteriovenous vascular access complications, and the composite of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events were compared between incremental and conventional hemodialysis by Cox proportional hazards model.
Results: Of the 113 patients enrolled in the study, 45 underwent incremental and 68 conventional hemodialysis. There were no significant differences in the changes from baseline to post-baseline visits in complication indicators between the two groups. Incremental hemodialysis reduced the risks of RKF loss (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14– 0.82), de novo arteriovenous access complication (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08– 0.82), and recurrent arteriovenous access complications under the Andersen–Gill (AG) model (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10– 0.74) and the Prentice, Williams and Peterson Total Time (PWP-TT) model (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12– 0.80). There were no significant differences in all-cause hospitalization or the composite outcome between groups.
Conclusion: Incremental hemodialysis is an effective dialysis transition strategy that preserves RKF and arteriovenous access without affecting dialysis adequacy, patient stability, hospitalization risk and mortality risk. Randomized controlled trials are warranted.
Keywords: incremental hemodialysis, arteriovenous vascular access, residual kidney function, hospitalization, mortality